WPF - World Photography Forum
Home Gallery Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts

Welcome to World Photography Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to World Photography Forum, a dedicated community for photographers and enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   World Photography Forum > Photography Equipment > Lenses


Lenses Discussion of Lenses

Low Light Sports Lenses for a newbie

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 10-05-10, 14:30
Fahrenheit Fahrenheit is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Andover - hants
Posts: 8
Default Low Light Sports Lenses for a newbie

Hi all, Ok before anyone states the obvious yes i would love to buy the 70-200 f2.8 is canon L series lens but i cannot justify that sort of layout as yet.

The shots i take are ringside and up to 5 metres away of wrestling matches.
I know i need the power of a f2.8 lens but am unsure of the realistic options i have available to me. Image stabilisation is a definite yes as the action is very fast at times.

I am looking for realistic suggestions of lenses that i know will not be of the quality of the canon but will be a good step in the right direction and will not be totally unusabe in the future.

I am guessing the sorts of zoom range i am looking at is anywhere from 17 - 125mm please help!

(canon 500d)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-05-10, 16:32
miketoll's Avatar
miketoll miketoll is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 7,628
Default

IS is there to reduce camera shake but it does nothing to reduce blur from fast action. You need high ISO and wide apertures to give high shutter speeds. Which camera do you have, crop camera or full frame as that affects choice? I presume you have Canon or you would not mention the Canon lens.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-05-10, 16:51
Fahrenheit Fahrenheit is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Andover - hants
Posts: 8
Default

Sorry i have a canon 500d 1.6 crop sensor

I am aware that i need to use high iso, its more the use of the words blur and shake - apologies. I have been shooting with the kit lens 18-55 at iso 1600 with ok results but having to do alot of post production.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-05-10, 17:29
surfg1mp's Avatar
surfg1mp surfg1mp is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Abingdon, Oxford, UK
Age: 52
Posts: 1,782
Default

I am a nikon owner but also looking for a fast lens, im going to get the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 17-55mm f/2.8G IF-ED Lens which is expensive but ive seen them second hand for a reasonable price.

This does'nt help you but i was also looking at cheaper alternatives and the Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 Lens for canon seems to fit the bill. Alot of people on flickr seem to rate it and can be picked up for £250 on ebay.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-05-10, 19:04
miketoll's Avatar
miketoll miketoll is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 7,628
Default

Obvious question, price range?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-05-10, 20:34
Fahrenheit Fahrenheit is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Andover - hants
Posts: 8
Default

At the moment anything less than the canon.

I really am open to all options

Additional info i plan to make up my complete kit with other lenses as follows

sigma 18-250 f3.5 - 6.3 superzoom
or rated 70 - 300 zoom must go down to at least f3.5
50mm 1.8 prime lens

and........ your recommendations
for the fast lens

initial thoughts are 17-70 f2.8 sigma or tamron
canon 24-70mm
but please tell me lenses you have used or are using as a newbie i know i will buy and upgrade when the time is right

thanks in advance
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-05-10, 20:41
Alex1994's Avatar
Alex1994 Alex1994 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 806
Default

What about a Canon 135 or 200mm prime lens? Both open up to f2.8
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-05-10, 20:51
Fahrenheit Fahrenheit is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Andover - hants
Posts: 8
Default

think these will be too big as i can be as close as 1metre from the action so i believe these are too big and better for portraiture
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-05-10, 20:52
Alex1994's Avatar
Alex1994 Alex1994 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 806
Default

OK, grab the 100mm then ;-) Or even the 50mm prime should be fine really.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-05-10, 11:17
Fahrenheit Fahrenheit is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Andover - hants
Posts: 8
Default

50mm prime being purchased as we speak, but what about a lens with the advantage of zoom?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:37.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.