WPF - World Photography Forum
Home Gallery Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts

Welcome to World Photography Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to World Photography Forum, a dedicated community for photographers and enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   World Photography Forum > Photography Equipment > Lenses


Lenses Discussion of Lenses

lens love - what's your favourite/dream lens?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 20-04-11, 13:10
postcardcv's Avatar
postcardcv postcardcv is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norfolk
Age: 49
Posts: 1,856
Default lens love - what's your favourite/dream lens?

Comments have been made elsewhere on the forum that there isn't enough chat on here... so I've decided to try and start a few threads to try and get things going a bit.

I guess as we're all interested in taking photos, many of us will be interested in the tools of the trade. I have no hesitation in admitting that I am emotionally attached to some of my gear and I doubt I'm the only one. Much as I love cameras I get far more attached to lenses, cameras come and go but a decent lens is here to stay.

So I'm curious to know what lens(es) you have that you can't imagine parting with or which lenses do you dream of owning? I hope I'm not the only one who loves talking about the gear I use aswell as the photos I take.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 20-04-11, 13:17
postcardcv's Avatar
postcardcv postcardcv is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norfolk
Age: 49
Posts: 1,856
Default

I'm going to kick off with a lens that has grown on me and now I would hate to be without (will post about other lenses later).

A few years back I was shooting my first weddings and needed a good fast lens, I couldn't afford to buy new so ended up with a used Canon 28-70 f2.8 L. My first thought was that this huge lump of glass had better be good if I was going to have to carry it all day long. An hour of test shooting later and I realised that it was worth the weight, AF is super fast and acurate and the images were pin sharp even when shooting at f2.8. For the first few weddings I played it safe and shot at f5.6-f8 but got results I was happy with.

Then the doubts kicked in, would I be better with a 24-105 f4 (IS would be good) or even bite the bullet and buy the new 24-70 f2.8. I tried both and could see the appeal of them, but the 24-105 was softer even at f8 and the only plus of the 24-70 was 4mm at the wide end. So I stuck with the lens and started shooting wider, shooting it regularly at f2.8 I finally got what the lens was about. Now, many weddings later I can't imagine shooting a wedding without this lens, a definite keeper.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 20-04-11, 18:41
Birdsnapper's Avatar
Birdsnapper Birdsnapper is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lincs
Posts: 5,679
Default

I love my sigma 10-20 wide angle on my 20D for landscapes. But at the moment it's a case of the last one is the best one. The Panasonic 14-140 (28-280 35mm equivalent) on the GH2 is very good. The camera and lens are light and compact and are great for carrying around with bird watching gear.
__________________
Mike
Nobody ever erected a statue of a critic
http://www.pbase.com/sunnycote
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 20-04-11, 20:50
miketoll's Avatar
miketoll miketoll is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 7,628
Default

Horses for courses, love my Canon 100mm macro and am amazed by it's sharpness plus the IS is a bonus. Also love my 400 DO although I find it a bit heavy to carry round all day these days but any "big gun" would be the same or worse.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 20-04-11, 22:55
Adey Baker's Avatar
Adey Baker Adey Baker is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hinckley, Leics., UK
Posts: 973
Default

My favourite lens is my Sigma 400mm F5.6 Apo/Macro HSM lens which I've used to shoot everything from damselflies (http://www.worldphotographyforum.com...7810&ppuser=43) to Mont Blanc (http://www.worldphotographyforum.com...7810&ppuser=43). I can't understand why Sigma don't still make this lens - look how many times people have bemoaned the fact that the Canon 400mm F5.6 doesn't focus as close as that company's 100-400mm zoom lens, yet there are still lots of the prime lenses around which are potential lost sales for Sigma.

The lens I dream of getting probably isn't available yet, as I would like to carry around something smaller and lighter such as a micro 4/3rds system camera but as far as I know there isn't anything that can match my 400mm in both image quality and long-range 'macro' capabilities. When you add in the HSM 'silent' focus and full-time manual-focus over-ride via a generous-size focus ring, etc., there are just too many compromises to take into account, so I'll just have to dream on for the time being...
__________________
Adey

http://www.birdforum.net/pp_gallery/...00/ppuser/1805

'Write when there is something you know: and not before: and not too damned much after' Ernest Hemingway
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 21-04-11, 00:59
surfg1mp's Avatar
surfg1mp surfg1mp is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Abingdon, Oxford, UK
Age: 52
Posts: 1,782
Default

My Favorite Lens at the moment is the Nikon 35mm 1.8. It was my first fast lens and i love the fact that it is almost as the eye sees, or seems that way to me. Its nice to be able to shoot in low light situations without flash and still get super sharp images with dreamy blurred backgrounds and amazing bokeh. Being a prime and not having any zoom has also taught me alot about composition. Think you can get lazy when you have a zoom attached to your camera. With a prime you have to physically move to get the composition you are after.

I am currently saving for a Nikon 17-55mm 2.8, I have been lusting after this lens for a long time now and cant wait to get one. Then I want the 70-200 2.8, hopefully these two lenses will live up to my expectations.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 21-04-11, 08:25
Al Tee's Avatar
Al Tee Al Tee is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: North West England
Age: 66
Posts: 3,127
Default

Sigma 10-20 for me if I've ever got £400 spare..borrowed Jamies once..liked the potential..& a second hand minolta 50mm 1.8 if I ever stumble across one & can thus beg & grovel to Mrs Tee sufficiently into letting me have some cash..(had more pocket money when I was 10)!
Al.
__________________
Educated at Cambridge...............(Street Junior School)!
The more people I meet the more I like my dogs!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 21-04-11, 10:21
Arthur53's Avatar
Arthur53 Arthur53 is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Spain
Age: 71
Posts: 3,874
Red face

Guess it has to be the G vario 14-45. .Yes its the kit lens that came with the camera but its the only lens I have.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 21-04-11, 11:27
gordon g gordon g is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Barnsley
Posts: 2,766
Default

My workhorse lenses are the sigma 24-70 EXf2.8 and 70-200 EXf2.8. Between the two of them, they account for about 80% of my images. The other lenses that see a lot of use are the sigma 100 macro and tamron 180 macro.
Lenses to lust for? When I was more into bird photography than I am nowadays, the sigma 300-800 - totally unique lens, but some weight to carry anywhere. These days, I rather like the idea of a wide angle tilt and shift, having seen the results a friend was getting with his canon 24mm t&s lens a few months ago. The cost of it though realistically will keep this a fantasy for some time though!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 21-04-11, 14:11
Gidders's Avatar
Gidders Gidders is offline  
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 2,795
Default

My most used lens is a Canon 24-104 f4 which accounts for 50%+ of my shots ... but it is very much a workhorse lens for me rather than a creative lens.

I had access to a 100mm f2.8 for a little while and I loved the creative opportunities that shooting wide open gave <<Like This>> for example
so I keep looking at the Canon 24-70 f2.8 ... but wondering ... would I miss the IS, would I miss the reach?

I'm also tempted to go for a collection of fast primes eg Sigma 30/50/85 f1.4

Thoughts anyone?
__________________
Clive
http://www.alteredimages.uk.com
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:58.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.