WPF - World Photography Forum
Home Gallery Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts

Welcome to World Photography Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to World Photography Forum, a dedicated community for photographers and enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   World Photography Forum > Photography Technique > Macro Photography Technique


Macro Photography Technique Discussions on Macro Photography

Extension tubes. Expensive or cheap. Is there a difference

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 06-08-09, 11:15
weeds weeds is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 28
Default Extension tubes. Expensive or cheap. Is there a difference

Hi all,

I am looking at purchasing some extension tubes and have noticed that there are a lot of variations in price. My local specialist camera store has sets starting at $250 AUD all the way up to $329 AUD.

I have also seen extension tube set or 2 on ebay for as low as $17 AUD. Basically extension tubes are hollow tubes. Is there a difference between the $17 tubes and the more expensive $250 and $329 tubes??

I am shooting with a Nikon D90 and the 105mm f2.8 VR lens.

All advice appreciated.
__________________
I'm starting to get the hang of this thing they call photography

Check out some of my photos at:

www.flickr.com/photos/pooly_dw
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-08-09, 12:36
robski robski is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kent UK
Posts: 3,755
Default

The very cheap versions have no support for your lens electronics. So in the worse case you will be manual focus and shooting wide open with an electronic lens. If your lens is fully manual anyway I am sure they are ideal.

I don't know about Nikon lens so hopefully a Nikon user can fill in the blanks.
__________________
Rob

-----------------------------------------------------
Solar powered Box Brownie Mk2

Captain Sunshine, to be such a man as he, and walk so pure between the earth and the sea.

WPF Gallery
Birdforum Gallery

Last edited by robski; 06-08-09 at 15:31.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-08-09, 15:23
gordon g gordon g is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Barnsley
Posts: 2,766
Default

All they are is a tube with or without the electrical contacts to enable your lens to function. Assuming the cheap ones have the contacts to support your lens functions, why pay more for a branded version? I have just bought a set of kenko extension tubes (12mm, 24 mm and 36mm) for roughly the same money as a single 12mm canon extension tube would cost.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-08-09, 16:01
Don Hoey's Avatar
Don Hoey Don Hoey is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 4,462
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by weeds View Post
I am shooting with a Nikon D90 and the 105mm f2.8 VR lens.
As this is a ' G ' type lens ( no manual control of aperture ) you are limited to independants only for extension tubes. Nikon do not make tubes that contain the electronic links you need for this lens.

In my experience the main difference between cheap and expensive is in the tightness of the bayonet mount. Cheaper versions being quite loose if used more than singly.

Don
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-08-09, 12:46
weeds weeds is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 28
Default

Thanks Gordon and Robski.

I'm not fussed about the tubes being of Nikon brand. I would like the tubes to have electronics so they can detect Aperture settings though and any other settings required.

As long as they don't damage my camera body or the lens in anyway I'll be happy with them.
Some people have told me that the cheaper tubes don't "seal" as well and that light leaks through. Have you or anyone encountered this problem before?

Thanks heaps.
Scott
__________________
I'm starting to get the hang of this thing they call photography

Check out some of my photos at:

www.flickr.com/photos/pooly_dw
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-08-09, 23:16
gordon g gordon g is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Barnsley
Posts: 2,766
Default

Not so far, but mine are still quite new.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-09-09, 08:40
Canon Kid's Avatar
Canon Kid Canon Kid is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 223
Default

I would go for Kenko good name and you will have no problems, why would you hang your $1000 lens of $17 spacers, its no brainer, go for Kenko.
__________________
Terry
Love Them Animals Birds Dragonflies Butterflies Insects Flowers Landscapes

http://www.pbase.com/canon_boy
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:41.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.