WPF - World Photography Forum
Home Gallery Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts

Welcome to World Photography Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to World Photography Forum, a dedicated community for photographers and enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   World Photography Forum > Photography Technique > Macro Photography Technique


Macro Photography Technique Discussions on Macro Photography

how close? extension tubes and teleconverters

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #41  
Old 06-01-06, 07:44
pxl8 pxl8 is offline  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Somerset
Age: 56
Posts: 13
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roy C
Changing the subject slightly but can the experts tell me the difference between the 'focusing distance' and the 'working distance' when using an extention tube.
Focusing distance is the length from the focal plane (film or sensor) to the subject.

Working distance is the length from the front of the lens to the subject.

The difference is the length of the tube plus the length of the lens which changes with focus (unless it's an internal focus lens). In your example this value is 93mm at min. focus and 85mm at infinity.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 03-03-06, 10:49
prostie1200 prostie1200 is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: hampshire uk
Age: 89
Posts: 1,325
Default Trouble with Maths

The image I have attached was taken with a D70 – PB-5 Bellows at 80mm with an M2ext ,105mm 2.8D lens, f32 at 1/60, the working distance, lens to subject was 4” and lit by a lateral undiffused 60watt tungsten light. WB set to tungsten ISO100.

The subject is a balance wheel in a small wrist watch, which measures 8mmDia – how do I determine the magnification?

I tried to find it by measurement – converted the Raw file to jpeg in PS and the rulers showed the Image size as 24.7 x 16.5, which is roughly the size of the CCD – would the Mag be the ratio of the Dia of the wheel to the overall width of the image?.

Thanks for any help.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Macro.jpg (237.9 KB, 21 views)
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 03-03-06, 11:49
Don Hoey's Avatar
Don Hoey Don Hoey is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 4,462
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by prostie1200
The image I have attached was taken with a D70 – PB-5 Bellows at 80mm with an M2ext ,105mm 2.8D lens, f32 at 1/60, the working distance, lens to subject was 4” and lit by a lateral undiffused 60watt tungsten light. WB set to tungsten ISO100.

The subject is a balance wheel in a small wrist watch, which measures 8mmDia – how do I determine the magnification?
I don't know about the maths, but thought I would say that it is a pretty impressive macro shot.

Don
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 03-03-06, 13:29
prostie1200 prostie1200 is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: hampshire uk
Age: 89
Posts: 1,325
Default

Thanks Don

All my stuff is trial and error at the moment, I like photographing small things that dont hop about too much.

Thanks be to Digital, makes the learning curve so much easier being able to adjust, lighting, focus etc. etc., and see the results instantly throgh the display or PC.

PS. I would still like to be able to work out the Mag Ratio though. lol

Last edited by prostie1200; 03-03-06 at 13:31.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 03-03-06, 21:31
Don Hoey's Avatar
Don Hoey Don Hoey is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 4,462
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by prostie1200
I would still like to be able to work out the Mag Ratio though. lol
I will have a search when my brain is a bit fresher. Been doing other things today and its a bit fried.

Quick look though and found this .. don't know if it will give the necessary info. http://www.jeffree.co.uk/Pages/macro-lens-calcs.html

Keep going with the pics, agree things are easier if they don't move of their own accord.

Don
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 03-03-06, 23:11
Don Hoey's Avatar
Don Hoey Don Hoey is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 4,462
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by prostie1200
Thanks Don

All my stuff is trial and error at the moment, I like photographing small things that dont hop about too much.

Thanks be to Digital, makes the learning curve so much easier being able to adjust, lighting, focus etc. etc., and see the results instantly throgh the display or PC.

PS. I would still like to be able to work out the Mag Ratio though. lol
Well after half an hour of searching I found this site that may be interesting http://www.macrophotography.org/index.php

Don
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 04-03-06, 09:36
prostie1200 prostie1200 is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: hampshire uk
Age: 89
Posts: 1,325
Default

Thanks Don
Off to a family wedding have to travel - have packed lens, spare batteries etc. ( nice venue Highclere Castle)
Will give your link a visit tomorrow.

Regards
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 21:32.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.