|
|
| Welcome to World Photography Forum! | |
 | Thank you for finding your way to World Photography Forum, a dedicated community for photographers and enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!
|
|
|||||||
| Cameras Discussion on Cameras of all types |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#11
02-11-20, 19:09
|
||||
|
||||
It depends on what you want to use the images for. For the internet, 1mpx is clean and beautiful, and for newspaper or magazine publication, 3mpx is enough. I printed a 30x90cm photobook and they reached 12 mpx.
__________________
My blog general blog 
|
|
#12
03-11-20, 15:14
|
||||
|
||||
|
It also depends on what your subject is & what lens you have available. For small birds I'd generally need more than I have (along with better focusing/sharper optics).
If I don't have to crop the hell out of a shot 16MP has always proved more than plenty & I rarely had problems when I only had 6MP.
__________________
Mike Pentax K5ii & Panasonic G5 user (with far too many bits to list) Member of North Essex Photographic Workshop Also online with PentaxUser.co.uk, Flickr, MU-43, MFLenses...
|
|
#13
09-01-21, 06:44
|
||||
|
||||
|
What the elapsed time has taught me: "There is no such a thing as enough Pixels"... and in due time, as our technology improves, we get more of Pixels, all the time and sometimes, and to surprise more, "More is for less". That is you get more Pixel for the less price tag you pay for the better technology. So don't settle for a number and enjoy "What comes May", that is really better when less is what you pay!
__________________
S a s s a n . ------------------------------ "No one is going to take our democracy away from us. Not now, not ever. " JOE BIDEN
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
