WPF - World Photography Forum
Home Gallery Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts

Welcome to World Photography Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to World Photography Forum, a dedicated community for photographers and enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   World Photography Forum > Photography Equipment > Lenses


Lenses Discussion of Lenses

Super / Ultra wide angle

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 18-04-12, 12:31
Himself's Avatar
Himself Himself is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: 54.55.5N 001.22.2W
Posts: 1,579
Default Super / Ultra wide angle

I was driving along the coast here in Sunderland last night when a shower passed over & a full rainbow was cast over the sea, as I only had my Panasonic FZ28 I took a pic, see Gallery. I also have a Nikon D40 but even the lens 18mm-55mm would not have captured the full bow....What I need is a super / ultra wide lens. Years ago I had a Chinon CE4 with a wide angle lens that would have captured the lot but that was a long time ago & I never took the subject seriously enough, I just took random 'That looks good' shots, what could, should I be investing in to get these great seascapes as I never took any notice of the kit I bought them days. Doh!! Many thanks, Pat

ps Not bothered about price but cheapest to dearest will do!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 18-04-12, 13:47
miketoll's Avatar
miketoll miketoll is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 7,628
Default

Sigma do a couple of 10-20 zoom lenses with different maximum apertures which would give you a 15-30 equivalent on your Nikon. They even do a 8-16 if you really want to go very wide! Tamron do a 10-24. Nikon also do similar for rather more money.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 18-04-12, 21:55
Himself's Avatar
Himself Himself is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: 54.55.5N 001.22.2W
Posts: 1,579
Default

Thanks Mike, I will take a look at them.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 21-04-12, 12:23
surfg1mp's Avatar
surfg1mp surfg1mp is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Abingdon, Oxford, UK
Age: 52
Posts: 1,782
Default

Tokina 11-16 2.8.....no question!!!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-05-12, 14:16
dorsetman's Avatar
dorsetman dorsetman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: England
Posts: 528
Default

Hey himself, i had the same dilemma and tried both the Sigma 10-20 f3.5 and the tokina 11-16 and ended up with the Sigma. Both were excellent but the Sigma had better light bursts which were very pretty indeed and really churns out some beautiful, light images with great colour. Im sure its a personal thing but i wasnt sold on the one touch clutch mechanism on the Tokina. I have had the Sigma since Christmas and never stop using it and i know its only 1mm but it makes such a difference as to what you can fit into the image. I am getting so much into a frame now. I can stand less that a metre from a castle tower and fit the whole thing in top to bottom with stunning results. I paid undr £500 for it too so not bad money.

Do try both though, they are stunning lenses!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-05-12, 21:00
Himself's Avatar
Himself Himself is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: 54.55.5N 001.22.2W
Posts: 1,579
Default

Thanks Dorsetman, so I will go for the Sigma as more positives. Thanks for the tips.

Pat

Last edited by Himself; 04-05-12 at 21:09.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-06-12, 12:27
dorsetman's Avatar
dorsetman dorsetman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: England
Posts: 528
Default

Did you get the lens??
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-06-12, 22:07
Himself's Avatar
Himself Himself is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: 54.55.5N 001.22.2W
Posts: 1,579
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dorsetman View Post
Did you get the lens??
No not yet, daughter has been stalling on a few things so will let this one find its way...eventually.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-06-12, 22:31
surfg1mp's Avatar
surfg1mp surfg1mp is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Abingdon, Oxford, UK
Age: 52
Posts: 1,782
Default

wouldn't right off the tokina, never read a bad review. have had a play with a friends tokina 11-16 f4 version and it's a stunning solid feeling lens. The f2.8 is going to be my next purchase.

Had my fair share of sigma lenses and it's very hit and miss as to whether you get a good copy or not as their quality control is so poor.

Tokina set up by a load of guys from Nikon tend to turn out solid great quality products.

that's my tuppence anyway
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:23.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.