WPF - World Photography Forum
Home Gallery Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts

Welcome to World Photography Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to World Photography Forum, a dedicated community for photographers and enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   World Photography Forum > General Photography > News & Views from the World of Photography


News & Views from the World of Photography Discussion on the Latest News in the World of Photography

Can a few glass Negs be worth $200 million

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 29-07-10, 09:34
wolfie's Avatar
wolfie wolfie is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sutton On Sea
Posts: 2,555
Default Can a few glass Negs be worth $200 million

OK they're old Ansel Adams negs, but $200m.

http://edition.cnn.com/2010/SHOWBIZ/...id=2fTCNl04lzy
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 29-07-10, 10:05
miketoll's Avatar
miketoll miketoll is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 7,633
Default

Mmmm, the old adage springs to mind that anything is worth whatever somebody is willing to pay for it. I won't be buying, I am a little short of small change at the moment.......
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 29-07-10, 10:59
Alex1994's Avatar
Alex1994 Alex1994 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 806
Default

Rather cheap for fine art actually.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 29-07-10, 13:04
yelvertoft's Avatar
yelvertoft yelvertoft is offline  
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North Essex, UK
Age: 60
Posts: 8,486
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex1994 View Post
Rather cheap for fine art actually.
If you've even seen a "straight print" of an Adams negative, you'd realise his real genius was in the darkroom, not so much as a photographer.

I saw a major exhibition of his at the Boston MoMA many years ago. There was a separate side exhibition of his darkroom prowess and what a straight print looked like before he worked his magic. It really brought home that he was a good, but not exceptional photographer, an absolute genious in the darkroom though.

Having a box of negs will not create magic without a whole lot of other skills.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 29-07-10, 13:11
Alex1994's Avatar
Alex1994 Alex1994 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 806
Default

Certainly, Ansel made the negs come to life in the darkroom - in his own words: the negative is the score, while the print is the performance.

I reckon there are people out there who can make incredible Ansel-like prints out of those negs in the same way that there are conductors who will interpret Beethoven or Mozart music into an extraordinary performance.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 30-07-10, 16:33
yelvertoft's Avatar
yelvertoft yelvertoft is offline  
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North Essex, UK
Age: 60
Posts: 8,486
Default

Can someone enlighten me please? Surely the owner of the negatives can't actually sell any prints from them? He may own the negs, but the copyright must still be with the Adams estate?

Whilst they are still in copyright, they must surely be worthless to anyone but the copyright owner.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 24-08-10, 12:34
yelvertoft's Avatar
yelvertoft yelvertoft is offline  
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North Essex, UK
Age: 60
Posts: 8,486
Default

More information on this story:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-11068391
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 25-08-10, 17:59
Pepo Pepo is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Mexico
Age: 44
Posts: 57
Default

Quote:
The man who found a massive collection of thought-to-be-lost Ansel Adams negatives - worth millions - at a garage sale is now the subject of a lawsuit from the famous photographer's estate.

Rick Norsigian found the glass negatives at a garage sale ten years ago and spent the next decade trying to prove their authenticity through a bevy of independent experts. He says he was successful, and made worldwide media headlines in July when he began selling prints of the previously unseen photos.

But now the Ansel Adams Publishing Rights Trust - the organization that keeps track of Ansel Adams' work since his death - is calling it all a sham, the BBC is reporting.

The trust alleges trademark infringement, false advertising, trademark dilution, unfair competition and claims the negatives are fraudulent.

Norsigian's lawyers said experts have proven the authenticity of the negatives "beyond a reasonable doubt" and the case has "no merit."

None of the allegations in the lawsuit have been proven in court.
http://www.torontosun.com/news/world.../15124781.html
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:23.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.