Nikon and/or Canon dslr?

[keraprice]

don't you find nikon capture to be a bit on the slow side.i prefer raw shooter and photoshop cs2.

[ruchai]

Originally Posted by keraprice

don't you find nikon capture to be a bit on the slow side.i prefer raw shooter and photoshop cs2.

It not as fast as I would like it to run but I feel it is very user friendly.

[keraprice]

i agree and the quality is very good too.i just have to remember not to load too many images at one go or it chokes.

[Leif]

Originally Posted by ruchai

I have had a look at the D200 as a back-up and love it, I was ready to pay for it. The only reason I did not buy one is because it does not use SD card. I hate to have to buy a couple of very expensive CF cards while I already have enough SD cards. I also predict SD cards will eventually be the only card for all cameras. I suggest Nikon should use double slots in the D200. They already lost atleast 2 customers!

Compared to the price of the camera, the cards are inexpensive. I paid £1200 for the D200, and £73 including tax and P&P for a 2GB compact flash card with 100x data transfer speeds. But then again, maybe you're a bit more trigger happy than me.

Leif

[Leif]

Originally Posted by ruchai

It not as fast as I would like it to run but I feel it is very user friendly.

Yes I agree with that. And it routinely comes out as best, or equal best in terms of the image quality of the resulting TIFF file. But it is SLOW when editing D200 images. Aaarrrgghhh.

Leif