Welcome to World Photography Forum! | |
Thank you for finding your way to World Photography Forum, a dedicated community for photographers and enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!
|
|
Equipment Reviews Post a review of your equipment in here |
|
Thread Tools |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
LOL, that has been mentioned by some close to me With the lack of movement, it keeps stopping... I'll have to lease it out to keep it wound
__________________
Digiscoped.Com - Bird Photography Andy Bright.Com - Laughable Aviation Photography |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Here is my first offering from the lens. I walked 2.5 miles to the position with large lowepro photo-trekker rucksack with 300 f2.8VR inside and lens hood in operational position to fill the bag. I found it easier than I imagined both transportation and use. Only four arrivals in the hour I stayed and every one a keeper. This is a cracking lens now named 'Junior', remains to be seen if a prime at 300mm or 420mm (using 1.4TC) will be suitable or as flexible as a zoom at airshows.
__________________
http://www.aviation-photography.co.uk/ |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
Glad you're liking the lens, Stephen. I'd also be a little concerned about the lack of zoom for events like an airshow.
I'm starting to get very annoyed with the elasticated slip-on lens cover...slip-on, slip-off is hardly the correct term, struggle-on, struggle off is more like it. I think I'll be ditching that accessory from now on.
__________________
Digiscoped.Com - Bird Photography Andy Bright.Com - Laughable Aviation Photography |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
Agreed, the cover is annoying. The same is used in the 200-400. Both lenses do not attract much dust probably due to the long lens hood. In my field I usually stay in one position for a while so packing and unpacking is no real bother but I imagine a birder would move around.
If you find a clip on lens cap please advise as I like to cap my lenses when not in use at airshows as some props and helicopters can throw up lots of rubbish in the air, red arrows and other smoke generating acts can throw lots of diesel oil into the air, you dont want that on your front element!
__________________
http://www.aviation-photography.co.uk/ |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I didn't get a slip-on cover with my 600/4 and that's fine, so it's not a 'must have' for my 300 really.
__________________
Digiscoped.Com - Bird Photography Andy Bright.Com - Laughable Aviation Photography |
#28
|
||||
|
||||
I after using the 300 f2.8 for a full week with no problems I thought I would revisit the prospect of hand holding the 200-400VR and I feel as positive about it as I did about the 300 f2.8 a few weeks ago. My spindley arms have now turned into tree trunks!
A great thing about 200-400VR is a clear flat glass lens protector, like a UV filter that screws over the front element. I am thinking of one for the 300f2.8 but I see it has a "protective meniscus front element" However it did not protect mine from all sorts cleaned off each evening the past week. Does anyone know how a meniscus front element is protective and can it be removed or renewed?
__________________
http://www.aviation-photography.co.uk/ |
#29
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
nirofo. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|